April 15, 2012

(via darksilenceinsuburbia)

March 30, 2012

(Source: leedukes, via daltonsdaze)

March 19, 2012

icedteacoffee:

To my American followers, do you really have to pledge allegiance at school everyday?

(via mrsrobinsonsghost)

March 16, 2012
ftm-communist:

Unless you are ready for a complete change, America, I’m going to move in with Canada.

It’s not you, it’s me.  Alright, it’s you.

ftm-communist:

Unless you are ready for a complete change, America, I’m going to move in with Canada.

It’s not you, it’s me.  Alright, it’s you.

(Source: fabulous-trotskyist)

8:02pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZxxuZxI6FQ12
Filed under: us immigration 
March 9, 2012

(via fuckyeahmarxismleninism)

February 25, 2012
United States Foreign Policy in a Nutshell

readyokaygo:

Any nation who has precious resources, strategic position, or is a threat to U.S. hegemony is a terrorist state that possesses WMD’s and must be destroyed (but only because we want to liberate the people).

(via readyokaygo-deactivated20130325)

February 25, 2012
a-place-to-stand:

KABUL, Afghanistan — Children have frozen to death in Kabul over  the past three weeks after their families had fled war zones in  Afghanistan for refugee camps.

a-place-to-stand:

KABUL, Afghanistan — Children have frozen to death in Kabul over the past three weeks after their families had fled war zones in Afghanistan for refugee camps.

(via naazee-deactivated20120915)

February 23, 2012
5 Reasons You Should Never Agree to a Police Search (Even if You Have Nothing to Hide)

1. It’s your constitutional right.

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects us against unreasonable searches and seizures. Unless police have strong evidence (probable cause) to believe you’re involved in criminal activity, they need your permission to perform a search of you or your property.

You have the right to refuse random police searches anywhere and anytime, so long as you aren’t crossing a border checkpoint or entering a secure facility like an airport. Don’t be shy about standing up for your own privacy rights, especially when police are looking for evidence that could put you behind bars.

2. Refusing a search protects you if you end up in court.

It’s always possible that police might search you anyway when you refuse to give consent, but that’s no reason to say “yes” to the search. Basically, if there’s any chance of evidence being found, agreeing to a search is like committing legal suicide, because it kills your case before you even get to court.

If you refuse a search, however, the officer will have to prove in court that there was probable cause to do a warrantless search. This will give your lawyer a good chance to win your case, but this only works if you said “no” to the search.

3. Saying “no” can prevent a search altogether.

Data on police searches are interesting, but they don’t show how many searches didn’t happen because a citizen said no. A non-search is a non-event that goes unrecorded, giving rise to a widespread misconception that police will always search with or without permission.

I know refusing searches works because I’ve been collecting stories from real police encounters. The reality is that police routinely ask for permission to search when they have absolutely no evidence of an actual crime. If you remain calm and say no, there’s a good chance they’ll back down, because it’s a waste of time to do searches that won’t hold up in court anyway.

4. Searches can waste your time and damage your property.

Do you have time to sit around while police rifle through your belongings? Police often spend 30 minutes or more on vehicle searches and even longer searching homes. You certainly can’t count on officers to be careful with valuables or to put everything back where they found it. If you waive your 4th Amendment rights by agreeing to be searched, you will have few legal options if any property is damaged or missing after the search.

5. You never know what they’ll find.

Are you 100 percent certain there’s nothing illegal in your home or vehicle? You can never be too sure. A joint roach could stick to your shoe on the street and wind up on the floorboard. A careless acquaintance could have dropped a baggie behind the seat. Try telling a cop it isn’t yours, and they’ll just laugh and tell you to put your hands behind your back. If you agreed to the search, you can’t challenge the evidence. But if you’re innocent and you refused the search, your lawyer has a winnable case.

Remember that knowing your rights will help you protect yourself, but no amount of preparation can guarantee a good outcome in a bad situation. Your attitude and your choices before, during, and after the encounter will usually matter more than your knowledge of the law. Stay calm no matter what happens, and remember that you can always report misconduct after things settle down.

Finally, please don’t be shy about sharing this information with your friends and family. Understanding and asserting your rights isn’t about getting away with anything, and it isn’t about disrespecting police either. These rights are the foundation of freedom in America, and they get weaker whenever we fail to exercise them.

(Source: anticapitalist, via themarvelousmarxist)

January 29, 2012

January 16, 2012
mollyfamous:

occupyallstreets:

America Is Another Step Closer To A Police State (Must Read)
Farmington Hills, Michigan just became the first city in America to host a state-of-the-art system of lampposts that make up something called the Intellistreets system. 
Simply put, the Intellistreets project is a system of Internet-connected luminaries that communicate with one another across the city. In addition to lighting the area, they can broadcast verbal and written messages, monitor rainfall and give directions.’
According to their own website, the system is also great for “data harvesting.”
Not only does Intellistreets offer information about the neighborhood and provide light, it also monitors the conversations of pedestrians, records video, monitors foot-traffic and counts heads — all of which is recorded and stored for possible analysis. And according to Harwood, the tiny 80,000 community of Farmington Hills isn’t going to be the only town using his technology — Detroit, Chicago and Pittsburgh have placed orders and the inventor claims that he is in talks with the Department of Homeland Security.
“This is not a system with spook technology,” Harwood tells WXYZ News. To placate that argument, however, one must be comfortable knowing that their every move and whisper is recorded and monitored by a network of computers between posts that can be controlled by a central hub, iPhone or tablet.
“The transformation of street lights into surveillance tools for Homeland Security purposes will only serve to heighten concerns that the United States is fast on the way to becoming a high-tech police state,” Infowars reported recently. Even abroad, London’s Daily Mail has singled out the project for infringing on civil liberties.
As a backlash began to hit Intellistreets, the company removed a YouTube video that offered an eerie insight into the surveillance capabilities, touts itself as “The solution for all college campuses” and discusses the system’s ability to store and analyze data. 
As of November, Farmington Hills has nearly a dozen of the posts, which was afforded through $791,300 in federal Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) funds the city was awarded in 2009.
Source

Seriously scary! I guess Orwell was only off by a few decades… :(

Welcome to the occupation 

mollyfamous:

occupyallstreets:

America Is Another Step Closer To A Police State (Must Read)

Farmington Hills, Michigan just became the first city in America to host a state-of-the-art system of lampposts that make up something called the Intellistreets system. 

Simply put, the Intellistreets project is a system of Internet-connected luminaries that communicate with one another across the city. In addition to lighting the area, they can broadcast verbal and written messages, monitor rainfall and give directions.’

According to their own website, the system is also great for “data harvesting.”

Not only does Intellistreets offer information about the neighborhood and provide light, it also monitors the conversations of pedestrians, records video, monitors foot-traffic and counts heads — all of which is recorded and stored for possible analysis. And according to Harwood, the tiny 80,000 community of Farmington Hills isn’t going to be the only town using his technology — Detroit, Chicago and Pittsburgh have placed orders and the inventor claims that he is in talks with the Department of Homeland Security.

“This is not a system with spook technology,” Harwood tells WXYZ News. To placate that argument, however, one must be comfortable knowing that their every move and whisper is recorded and monitored by a network of computers between posts that can be controlled by a central hub, iPhone or tablet.

“The transformation of street lights into surveillance tools for Homeland Security purposes will only serve to heighten concerns that the United States is fast on the way to becoming a high-tech police state,” Infowars reported recently. Even abroad, London’s Daily Mail has singled out the project for infringing on civil liberties.

As a backlash began to hit Intellistreets, the company removed a YouTube video that offered an eerie insight into the surveillance capabilities, touts itself as “The solution for all college campuses” and discusses the system’s ability to store and analyze data. 

As of November, Farmington Hills has nearly a dozen of the posts, which was afforded through $791,300 in federal Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) funds the city was awarded in 2009.

Source

Seriously scary! I guess Orwell was only off by a few decades… :(

Welcome to the occupation 

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

January 13, 2012
The USA should invade the USA and win the hearts and minds of the population by building roads, bridges and putting locals to work.

(Source: valentinostclaire, via mrsrobinsonsghost)

7:38pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZxxuZxEkICEo
Filed under: seriously US 
January 12, 2012
Ready? Okay. Go!: Disrespecting Bodies is Nothing New in the U.S. Military

readyokaygo:

Recently, a video broke out of United States Marines urinating on dead Afghan militants. If you haven’t read about this yet, click here. But this is nothing new.

In 2009, Calvin Gibbs incited two soldiers to kill 15-year-old Gul Mudin as he worked in a field. The platoon commander gave a…

Absolutely unbelievable…  People in the US: this is done in our name.

(via readyokaygo-deactivated20130325)

8:48pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZxxuZxEhVM4y
Filed under: military US 
December 24, 2011
Repressing Democracy, With American Arms

Ali grew up here in Sitra, a collection of poor villages far from the gleaming bank towers of Bahrain’s skyline. Almost every day pro-democracy protests still bubble up in Sitra, and even when they are completely peaceful they are crushed with a barrage of American-made tear gas.

(Source: The New York Times, via warcrimenancydrew)

September 28, 2011
switchbladesmile:

Michael Moore: Do you know that on the day of the Columbine massacre, the US dropped more bombs on Kosovo than any other day?  Marilyn Manson: I do know that, and I think that’s really ironic, that nobody said ‘well  maybe the President had an influence on this violent behavior’ Because  that’s not the way the media wants to take it and spin it, and turn it  into fear, because then you’re watching television, you’re watching the  news, you’re being pumped full of fear, there’s floods, there’s AIDS,  there’s murder, cut to commercial, buy the Acura, buy the Colgate, if  you have bad breath they’re not going to talk to you, if you have  pimples, the girl’s not going to fuck you, and it’s just this campaign  of fear, and consumption, and that’s what I think it’s all based on, the  whole idea of ‘keep everyone afraid, and they’ll consume.’

Bowling for Columbine (2002)

switchbladesmile:

Michael Moore: Do you know that on the day of the Columbine massacre, the US dropped more bombs on Kosovo than any other day?
Marilyn Manson: I do know that, and I think that’s really ironic, that nobody said ‘well maybe the President had an influence on this violent behavior’ Because that’s not the way the media wants to take it and spin it, and turn it into fear, because then you’re watching television, you’re watching the news, you’re being pumped full of fear, there’s floods, there’s AIDS, there’s murder, cut to commercial, buy the Acura, buy the Colgate, if you have bad breath they’re not going to talk to you, if you have pimples, the girl’s not going to fuck you, and it’s just this campaign of fear, and consumption, and that’s what I think it’s all based on, the whole idea of ‘keep everyone afraid, and they’ll consume.’

Bowling for Columbine (2002)

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »